Skip to content

BUZZ-270: Prepare community access verification runbook - #8235

Open
bradseiler wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/buzz-270-draft-prep
Open

bradseiler wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/buzz-270-draft-prep

Conversation

@bradseiler

@bradseiler bradseiler commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Add a repeatable community-access verification runbook and an evidence template for an exact deployed revision. The steps cover invitation revocation, bans and timeouts, existing root/audio sessions, tenant isolation, cross-pod limits, and webhook-owner policy.

Staging execution remains pending merged prerequisites, passing checks, a deployment owner, and an authorized disposable community. The template starts at NOT RUN and requires exact image/source versions, per-case outcomes, and cleanup confirmation.

Related issue

BUZZ-270. Merged source remediation: #8005. Prerequisites: invitation replacement #8237 and regression coverage #8239. Staging remains NOT RUN.

Testing

Verified all relative document links and the complete diff at c15c77fd4085beb8f859a45959585d24413647f7. Independent review found no blockers. Commands were checked against the current CLI source. No staging execution or human verification is claimed.

Companion drafts

Live-session revalidation: BUZZ-271. Webhook owner policy: BUZZ-272.

Already merged source prerequisites: #7706, #7828, #8128, #8130. Staging remains NOT RUN.

Generated with Codex

🤖 Documentation review correction

At eb3b03afc3238de7a46916ca8d0d40a9fd6353da, local rehearsal requires an integrated candidate containing #8239 before using the route guard. The runbook now states the mandatory BUZZ_POSTGRES_ADMIN_URL, PostgreSQL bootstrap variables/privileges, isolated Redis setup, and disposable-database requirement; default/shared services must not be reused. Exact-head content, local links/anchors, diff checks, and normal commit/push hooks passed. Application-test lanes skipped for this documentation-only delta. Staging is NOT RUN; deployment-owner authorization, prerequisites, and exact deployed revisions remain required.

Add a repeatable staging runbook and versioned evidence template. Execution remains gated on deployed prerequisites and a disposable community owner.

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Signed-off-by: Brad Seiler <seiler@squareup.com>
Signed-off-by: Local Builder <1c476cb1127ea270cb900bdc3891060140bdd1173f91498030ee9b4db01c2f20@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
@bradseiler
bradseiler marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2026 03:52
@bradseiler
bradseiler requested a review from a team as a code owner October 12, 2026 03:52
@bradseiler
bradseiler deployed to codex-review October 12, 2026 03:52 — with GitHub Actions Active
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the codex-security-review-current The posted Codex security review matches its recorded range. label Oct 12, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔐 Codex Security Review

Note: This is an automated, security-focused review generated by Codex.
Use it as a supplement to human review; false positives are possible.

Scope

  • Exact PR diff: 30873ba46b5e08602ae61a2a0592ecedd37f7289...eb3b03afc3238de7a46916ca8d0d40a9fd6353da
  • Model: gpt-6.1-sol

💡 Click "edited" above to see earlier reviews for this PR.


Review Summary

Overall Risk: NONE

The PR adds only a verification runbook and evidence template. No concrete security, correctness, or reliability issues were found in the authorized range.

Findings

No concrete security, correctness, or reliability findings were identified.

Notes

  • Review used read-only inspection. Deployment behavior and prerequisite PR implementations were not verified.

Generated by Codex Security Review |
Requested by: @bradseiler |
Workflow run

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
codex-review — eb3b03af Deployed Oct 12, 2026 by bradseiler via Run Codex Security Review #7708
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

codex-security-review-current The posted Codex security review matches its recorded range.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant