Add purl mapping for cryptopp/crypto++

[Dashtid]

The NVD CPE dictionary contains 29 entries for cpe:2.3:a:cryptopp:crypto\+\+ (referenced by CVEs such as CVE-2019-14318), but the dataset currently has no cryptopp vendor folder, so Crypto++ purls resolve to no CPE.

This adds data/cryptopp/crypto++/purls.yml with the upstream repository and the distro source packages:

• pkg:deb/debian/libcrypto++ / pkg:deb/ubuntu/libcrypto++ (source package libcrypto++)
• pkg:github/weidai11/cryptopp (upstream)
• pkg:rpm/fedora/cryptopp
• pkg:rpm/opensuse/libcryptopp

Per CONTRIBUTING, cpes.yml is not included — is that backfilled from the NVD load once the folder exists, or would you prefer it added to this PR?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Added package links for Crypto++ across Debian, Ubuntu, GitHub, Fedora, and openSUSE ecosystems.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: cfbd0c78-38b3-4d65-9a0f-2ef2d89b4e89

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 84305b6 and 55704b9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• data/cryptopp/crypto++/purls.yml

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Crypto++ metadata now includes five package URLs covering Debian, Ubuntu, GitHub, Fedora, and openSUSE sources.

Changes

Crypto++ package mappings

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add Crypto++ package URLs data/cryptopp/crypto++/purls.yml	Adds five package URL entries for Debian, Ubuntu, GitHub, Fedora, and openSUSE Crypto++ packages.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title is concise and accurately summarizes the addition of purl mappings for Crypto++.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@data/cryptopp/crypto`++/purls.yml:
- Around line 1-6: The crypto++ PURL mapping list currently contains five
entries but the PR scope requires six. Update the purls collection in
crypto++/purls.yml by adding the intended sixth ecosystem mapping, or revise the
stated scope to match the implemented count before merging.
- Around line 2-3: Update the Debian and Ubuntu PURLs in the package entries to
percent-encode each plus sign as %2B, preserving the existing package names and
repository prefixes.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c8cf65ee-6283-4c57-baf2-44db00219650

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5ea3a1 and 84305b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• data/cryptopp/crypto++/purls.yml