Skip to content

ci: add release-2.1 branch to intelligent assistant action workflow - #586

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
redhat-developer:mainfrom
Jdubrick:codex/add-release-2.1-lightspeed-sync
Oct 5, 2026
Merged

openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
redhat-developer:mainfrom
Jdubrick:codex/add-release-2.1-lightspeed-sync

Conversation

@Jdubrick

@Jdubrick Jdubrick commented Oct 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description of the change

  • Adds release-2.1 to the list of target branches for the lightspeed(intelligent-assistant) sync workflow

Which issue(s) does this PR fix or relate to

https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/RHIDP-16806

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer

Checklist

  • For each Chart updated, version bumped in the corresponding Chart.yaml according to Semantic Versioning.
  • For each Chart updated, variables are documented in the values.yaml and added to the corresponding README.md. The pre-commit utility can be used to generate the necessary content. Run pre-commit run --all-files to run the hooks and then push any resulting changes. The pre-commit Workflow will enforce this and warn you if needed.
  • JSON Schema template updated and re-generated the raw schema via the pre-commit hook.
  • Tests pass using the Chart Testing tool and the ct lint command.
  • If you updated the orchestrator-infra chart, make sure the versions of the Knative CRDs are aligned with the versions of the CRDs installed by the OpenShift Serverless operators declared in the values.yaml file. See Installing Knative Eventing and Knative Serving CRDs for more details.

@Jdubrick
Jdubrick requested a review from a team as a code owner October 5, 2026 17:22
@rhdh-qodo-merge

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Grey Divider

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Grey Divider

Tip of the day
💡 Did you know, you can turn on the rule miner and Qodo learns your standards from review history

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Oct 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Jdubrick

Jdubrick commented Oct 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/cc @rm3l

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested a review from rm3l October 5, 2026 17:23
@rhdh-qodo-merge

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary by Qodo

ci: sync Lightspeed configs for release-2.1

⚙️ Configuration changes 🕐 Less than 5 minutes

Grey Divider

AI Description

• Add release-2.1 to the scheduled and manually triggered Lightspeed configuration sync.
• Reuse the existing workflow to propose upstream config changes on the release branch.
Diagram

graph TD
  A["Scheduled or manual run"] --> B["Branch matrix"] --> C["Sync script"] --> D["Upstream configs"] --> E["Vendored chart"] --> F["Sync PR"]
Loading
High-Level Assessment

Adding the branch to the existing matrix is the simplest approach; the workflow already handles later release branches without separate jobs or scripts.

Files changed (1) +1 / -0

Other (1) +1 / -0
sync-lightspeed-configs.yamlInclude release-2.1 in the Lightspeed sync matrix +1/-0

Include release-2.1 in the Lightspeed sync matrix

• Adds release-2.1 as a workflow matrix target so scheduled and manual runs also check that branch for upstream configuration changes.

.github/workflows/sync-lightspeed-configs.yaml

@rhdh-qodo-merge rhdh-qodo-merge Bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 5, 2026
@rhdh-qodo-merge

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

The /generate_labels command by Qodo is sunsetting on the 1st of October 2026 and will no longer be available. We recommend switching to the latest Qodo review capabilities. Learn more

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm label Oct 5, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot
openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 889f3e0 into redhat-developer:main Oct 5, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request lgtm

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants