Skip to content

Update imported {standalone} scripts to current source (#280)#281

Open
Melkiades wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
280_update_standalone@main
Open

Update imported {standalone} scripts to current source (#280)#281
Melkiades wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
280_update_standalone@main

Conversation

@Melkiades

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Synced the standalone helper files imported from insightsengineering/standalone to their current main versions via usethis::use_standalone():

Imported file before after
import-standalone-checks.R 2024-05-04 2025-05-08
import-standalone-stringr.R 2024-11-01 2026-06-30
import-standalone-tibble.R 2024-05-07 2026-06-30
import-standalone-forcats.R 2025-07-25 2026-06-30

check_pkg_installed and cli_call_env already matched the source and were left unchanged. import-standalone-purrr.R is sourced from r-lib/rlang and is out of scope.

DESCRIPTION was intentionally left unchanged: use_standalone() stripped existing version pins (e.g. rlang (>= 1.1.5)), which is out of scope for a source refresh.

Reference GitHub issue associated with pull request. closes #280


Pre-review Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete)

  • All GitHub Action workflows pass with a ✅
  • PR branch has pulled the most recent updates from master branch: usethis::pr_merge_main()
  • If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added.
  • Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features (generally, 100% coverage for new code): devtools::test_coverage()
  • Request a reviewer

Reviewer Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete)

  • If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added.
  • Run pkgdown::build_site(). Check the R console for errors, and review the rendered website.
  • Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features: devtools::test_coverage()

When the branch is ready to be merged:

  • Update NEWS.md with the changes from this pull request under the heading "# cards (development version)". If there is an issue associated with the pull request, reference it in parentheses at the end update (see NEWS.md for examples).
  • All GitHub Action workflows pass with a ✅
  • Approve Pull Request
  • Merge the PR. Please use "Squash and merge" or "Rebase and merge".

Refresh the standalone helper files imported from
insightsengineering/standalone to their current main versions via
usethis::use_standalone():

- import-standalone-checks.R      (2024-05-04 -> 2025-05-08)
- import-standalone-stringr.R     (2024-11-01 -> 2026-06-30)
- import-standalone-tibble.R      (2024-05-07 -> 2026-06-30)
- import-standalone-forcats.R     (2025-07-25 -> 2026-06-30)

DESCRIPTION was intentionally left unchanged; use_standalone() removed
existing version pins, which is out of scope for a source refresh.
@Melkiades

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I would only wait for insightsengineering/standalone#33

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files  259 suites   3m 39s ⏱️
259 tests 259 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
753 runs  753 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 84613e1.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                                 Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
-------------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/add_blank_rows.R                          63       0  100.00%
R/add_difference_row.R                     101       0  100.00%
R/add_forest_utils.R                        97      10  89.69%   76-79, 94-100
R/add_forest.R                             139       0  100.00%
R/add_hierarchical_count_row.R              33       0  100.00%
R/adjust_stat_columns_wrap.R                29       1  96.55%   59
R/annotate_gg_km.R                         141       0  100.00%
R/annotate_gg_pkc.R                         92       0  100.00%
R/annotate_gg.R                             81       0  100.00%
R/ard_tabulate_abnormal_by_baseline.R       65       0  100.00%
R/crane-package.R                            2       2  0.00%    26-27
R/deprecated.R                              21      21  0.00%    18-54
R/df_add_poolings.R                         41       0  100.00%
R/get_cox_pairwise_df.R                    163       0  100.00%
R/gg_km_utils.R                             39      14  64.10%   20-37
R/gg_km.R                                  143      37  74.13%   55-58, 75, 102, 176-181, 184-187, 197-199, 204-205, 239-241, 248-251, 255, 266-270, 283, 285-287
R/gg_lineplot.R                             94       0  100.00%
R/gg_mmrm_lineplot.R                       102       1  99.02%   106
R/gg_pkc_lineplot.R                         98       0  100.00%
R/gg_utils.R                               221       0  100.00%
R/label_roche.R                             72       0  100.00%
R/modify_header_rm_md.R                     18       2  88.89%   35-36
R/modify_zero_recode.R                      20       1  95.00%   64
R/reverse_difference_ci.R                   33       0  100.00%
R/tbl_baseline_chg.R                       188       0  100.00%
R/tbl_coxph.R                               90       1  98.89%   229
R/tbl_hierarchical_incidence_rate.R        291       4  98.63%   430-433
R/tbl_hierarchical_rate_and_count.R        339      13  96.17%   343, 425, 446-456
R/tbl_hierarchical_rate_by_grade.R         317       3  99.05%   169-171
R/tbl_listing.R                             35       0  100.00%
R/tbl_mmrm.R                               254       1  99.61%   393
R/tbl_null_report.R                          9       0  100.00%
R/tbl_rmpt.R                               157      12  92.36%   299-304, 316-321
R/tbl_roche_subgroups.R                    155       0  100.00%
R/tbl_roche_summary.R                       64       0  100.00%
R/tbl_shift.R                              116       0  100.00%
R/tbl_survfit_quantiles.R                  154       0  100.00%
R/tbl_survfit_times.R                       92       0  100.00%
R/tbl_with_pools.R                          64       0  100.00%
R/theme_gtsummary_roche.R                   84       1  98.81%   61
R/utils.R                                   42       0  100.00%
TOTAL                                     4359     124  97.16%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: 84613e1

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Unit Test Performance Difference

Additional test case details
Test Suite $Status$ Time on main $±Time$ Test Case
annotate_gg 💚 $5.78$ $-1.07$ annotate_lineplot_df_warns_if_plot_is_not_generated_by_gg_lineplot
gg_km 💚 $1.10$ $-1.04$ gg_km_works_and_handles_annotations_correctly
gg_utils 💚 $1.83$ $-1.00$ df2gg_aligned_input_validation_and_error_handling_works
tbl_hierarchical_rate_by_grade 💚 $2.69$ $-1.68$ tbl_hierarchical_rate_by_grade_works
tbl_roche_summary 💔 $4.89$ $+1.82$ tbl_roche_summary_works
tbl_shift 💚 $4.89$ $-2.61$ tbl_shift_strata_location_
tbl_with_pools 💔 $14.97$ $+2.32$ tbl_with_pools_validates_inputs_correctly

Results for commit d009717

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update imported {standalone} scripts to current source

1 participant