Update Rust crate `tower-http` to v0.6.11 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8746 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-05-23T11:04:50Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
tower-http	workspace.dependencies	patch	`0.6.9` → `0.6.11`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

tower-rs/tower-http (tower-http)

`v0.6.11`

Compare Source

Added

set-header: add SetMultipleResponseHeadersLayer and
SetMultipleResponseHeader for setting multiple response headers at once.
Supports overriding, appending, and if_not_present modes. Header
values can be fixed or computed dynamically via closures (#672)

use http::{Response, header::{self, HeaderValue}};
use http_body::Body as _;
use tower_http::set_header::response::SetMultipleResponseHeadersLayer;

let layer = SetMultipleResponseHeadersLayer::overriding(vec![
    (header::X_FRAME_OPTIONS, HeaderValue::from_static("DENY")).into(),
    (header::CONTENT_LENGTH, |res: &Response<MyBody>| {
        res.body().size_hint().exact()
            .map(|size| HeaderValue::from_str(&size.to_string()).unwrap())
    }).into(),
]);

set-header: add SetMultipleRequestHeadersLayer and
SetMultipleRequestHeaders for setting multiple request headers at once,
mirroring the response-side API (#677)
classify: add From<i32> and From<NonZeroI32> impls for GrpcCode.
Unrecognized status codes map to GrpcCode::Unknown (#506)

Changed

compression: compress application/grpc-web responses. Previously all
application/grpc* content types were excluded from compression; now only
application/grpc (non-web) is excluded (#408)

Fixed

fs: fix ServeDir returning 500 instead of 405 for non-GET/HEAD requests
when call_fallback_on_method_not_allowed is enabled but no fallback service
is configured (#587)
fs: remove duplicate cfg attribute on is_reserved_dos_name (#675)

All PRs

ci: fix flaky encoding test, add nightly stress test job by @jlizen in #670
ci: use static timeout in stress-test workflow by @jlizen in #671
Fix serve_dir method not allowed handling when no fallback is configured by @soerenmeier in #587
Do compress grpc-web responses by @bouk in #408
add From impl for GrpcCode by @gshipilov in #506
feat(set_header): refactor and improve multiple header middleware by @seun-ja in #672
Remove duplicate cfg attribute for is_reserved_dos_name by @GlenDC in #675
feat: set multiple request header by @seun-ja in #677
chore: release 0.6.11 by @jlizen in #673

New Contributors

@gshipilov made their first contribution in #506
@seun-ja made their first contribution in #672

Full Changelog: tower-rs/tower-http@tower-http-0.6.10...tower-http-0.6.11

`v0.6.10`

Compare Source

Added

follow-redirect: expose Attempt::method() and Attempt::previous_method()
so redirect policies can react to method changes across redirects (e.g.
POST to GET on 301/303) (#559)

Fixed

Restore tokio and async-compression as no-op features. These will be
removed next breaking release (#667)

What's Changed

fix: restore tokio and async-compression as no-op features by @jlizen in #667
fix gate-ing of atomic64 in tests by @alexanderkjall in #607
follow_redirect: expose previous and next request methods by @lucab in #559
chore: release tower-http 0.6.10 by @jlizen in #669

New Contributors

@lucab made their first contribution in #559

Full Changelog: tower-rs/tower-http@tower-http-0.6.9...tower-http-0.6.10

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
Automerge
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

vercel · 2026-05-23T11:04:56Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 1, 2026 2:53pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 1, 2026 2:53pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Jun 1, 2026 2:53pm

cursor · 2026-05-23T11:04:57Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Dependency-only lockfile update with no first-party code changes; residual risk is limited to upstream HTTP middleware behavior in enabled features.

Overview
Bumps the resolved tower-http crate in Cargo.lock from 0.6.9 to 0.6.11 (patch release via Renovate). No application source or manifest edits appear in this diff—only the lockfile checksum/version and a few transitive windows-sys pin adjustments for colored and winapi-util.

Upstream 0.6.10–0.6.11 adds optional middleware APIs (multi-header setters, redirect attempt method accessors) and small behavior fixes (e.g. application/grpc-web may be compressed where it was skipped before; ServeDir 405 handling). This repo’s workspace dependency still declares tower-http with the trace feature; impact here is mainly whatever HTTP/Tower middleware paths already pull in through reqwest, sentry, or direct tower-http usage.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b8c7657. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-05-23T11:05:32Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust dependency tower-http from 0.6.9 to 0.6.10 by refreshing the lockfile.

Changes:

Bumps tower-http to pick up upstream fixes (restored no-op feature flags) and minor API additions for follow-redirect policies.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codecov · 2026-05-23T11:08:21Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.09%. Comparing base (eeea5cb) to head (b8c7657).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8746      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.09%   59.09%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1344     1344              
  Lines      129787   129787              
  Branches     5869     5869              
==========================================
- Hits        76704    76703       -1     
- Misses      52180    52181       +1     
  Partials      903      903

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.81% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.19% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.74% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.26% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`79.28% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.53% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`75.69% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`86.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.06% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-05-23T11:11:58Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing deps/rs/tower-rust-crates (b8c7657) with main (eeea5cb)}

github-actions · 2026-05-23T12:26:21Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.728 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.524 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.470 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.665 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.469 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.067 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.567 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.953 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.714 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.477 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.386 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$46.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$83.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 352 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.144 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$53.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$52.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$65.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.870 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$47.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.595 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$421 \mathrm{ms} \pm 884 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.237 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 551 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$84.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.013 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$271 \mathrm{ms} \pm 835 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-15.541 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.475 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$21.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.614 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$21.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.703 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$37.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$35.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.289 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.246 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.301 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$34.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.300 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$35.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.957 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.937 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.707 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$97.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 613 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 598 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.613 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 424 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 586 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 570 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 578 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 390 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 446 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 513 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 515 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$146 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$157 \mathrm{ms} \pm 431 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 484 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$577 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.24 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.101 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge May 23, 2026 11:04

hash-worker Bot assigned indietyp and TimDiekmann May 23, 2026

hash-worker Bot requested a review from a team May 23, 2026 11:04

github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label May 23, 2026

augmentcode Bot reviewed May 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

Update Rust crate tower-http to v0.6.11

b8c7657

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/tower-rust-crates branch from 94d0377 to b8c7657 Compare June 1, 2026 14:40

hash-worker Bot changed the title ~~Update Rust crate tower-http to v0.6.10~~ Update Rust crate tower-http to v0.6.11 Jun 1, 2026

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens June 1, 2026 14:43 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 1, 2026 14:45 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 1, 2026 14:53 View deployment

indietyp approved these changes Jun 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

hash-worker Bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 2, 2026

github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 2, 2026

indietyp added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 8, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit 232b539 Jun 8, 2026
227 of 240 checks passed

indietyp deleted the deps/rs/tower-rust-crates branch June 8, 2026 17:05

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented May 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

v0.6.11

Added

Changed

Fixed

All PRs

New Contributors

v0.6.10

Added

Fixed

What's Changed

New Contributors

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 23, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 23, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

hash-worker Bot commented May 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`v0.6.11`

`v0.6.10`

vercel Bot commented May 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented May 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented May 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading