Skip to content

Update eslint npm packages#8677

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/js/eslint-npm-packages
Open

Update eslint npm packages#8677
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/js/eslint-npm-packages

Conversation

@hash-worker

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
eslint-config-flat-gitignore 2.2.12.3.0 age confidence
eslint-import-resolver-node (source) 0.3.90.4.0 age confidence
eslint-plugin-react-hooks (source) 7.0.17.1.1 age confidence
eslint-plugin-react-x (source) 1.17.21.53.1 age confidence
eslint-plugin-storybook (source) 10.3.110.4.1 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

antfu/eslint-config-flat-gitignore (eslint-config-flat-gitignore)

v2.3.0

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
    View changes on GitHub
import-js/eslint-plugin-import (eslint-import-resolver-node)

v0.4.0

Compare Source

  • [breaking] by default, support the exports field
  • [deps] update is-core-module, resolve

v0.3.10

Compare Source

  • [deps] update is-core-module, resolve
  • [meta] add repository.directory field
  • [refactor] avoid hoisting
facebook/react (eslint-plugin-react-hooks)

v7.1.1

Compare Source

Note: 7.1.0 accidentally removed the component-hook-factories rule, causing errors for users who referenced it in their ESLint config. This is now fixed.

  • Add deprecated no-op component-hook-factories rule for backwards compatibility. (@​mofeiZ in #​36307)

v7.1.0

Compare Source

This release adds ESLint v10 support, improves performance by skipping compilation for non-React files, and includes compiler lint improvements including better set-state-in-effect detection, improved ref validation, and more helpful error reporting.

Rel1cx/eslint-react (eslint-plugin-react-x)

v1.53.1

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.53.0...v1.53.1

v1.53.0

Compare Source

✨ New
  • feat: update naming convention rules default excepts to include common patterns by @​Rel1cx in #​1216
🪄 Improvements

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.52.8...v1.53.0

v1.52.9

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.52.8...v1.52.9

v1.52.8

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.52.7...v1.52.8

v1.52.7

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.52.6...v1.52.7

v1.52.6

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: correct logic in naming-convention/component-name validation to continue on valid names, closes #​1176 by @​Rel1cx in #​1177

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.52.5...v1.52.6

v1.52.5

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: refactor is-from-react utility in debug/is-from-react rule and improve no-forward-ref rule autofix handling, closes #​1172 by @​Rel1cx in #​1173

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.52.4...v1.52.5

v1.52.4

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.52.3...v1.52.4

v1.52.3

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.52.2...v1.52.3

v1.52.2

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.52.1...v1.52.2

v1.52.1

Compare Source

✨ New
New Contributors

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.51.3...v1.52.1

v1.51.3

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.51.2...v1.51.3

v1.51.2

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: skip function components without name in prefer-read-only-props by @​Rel1cx in #​1125
🪄 Improvements
  • docs: update references from 'Language Config' to 'Project Config' across documentation by @​Rel1cx in #​1126

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.51.1...v1.51.2

v1.51.1

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.51.0...v1.51.1

v1.51.0

Compare Source

✨ New
🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.50.0...v1.51.0

v1.50.0

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
New Contributors

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.49.0...v1.50.0

v1.49.0

Compare Source

✨ New

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.48.5...v1.49.0

v1.48.5

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.48.4...v1.48.5

v1.48.4

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: update fallback react version in settings to "19.1.0"

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.48.3...v1.48.4

v1.48.3

Compare Source

🪄 Improvements

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.48.2...v1.48.3

v1.48.2

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: could not find hooks-extra/no-direct-set-state-in-use-effect in plugin react-hooks-extra, closes #​1077 by @​Rel1cx in #​1078

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.48.1...v1.48.2

v1.48.1

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: rewrite react api detection to better align with eslint-plugin-react-hook by @​Rel1cx in #​1074
  • fix: use preferred loc in error maker in hooks-extra/no-unnecessary-use-prefix by @​Rel1cx in #​1073

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.47.4...v1.48.0

v1.47.4

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: update hooks-extra/no-unnecessary-use-prefix to skip well-known hooks like useMDXComponents by @​Rel1cx in #​1072

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.47.3...v1.47.4

v1.47.3

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: fixed potential false negatives in no-leaked-conditional-rendering when logical expressions are wrapped by type expressions by @​Rel1cx in #​1068

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.47.2...v1.47.3

v1.47.2

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.47.1...v1.47.2

v1.47.1

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.47.0...v1.47.1

v1.47.0

Compare Source

🪄 Improvements
  • refactor: remove @eslint-react/jsx package and move functionality to @eslint-react/core by @​Rel1cx in #​1060

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.46.0...v1.47.0

v1.46.0

Compare Source

✨ New

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.45.3...v1.45.4

v1.45.4

Compare Source

🪄 Improvements

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.45.3...v1.45.4

v1.45.3

Compare Source

🪄 Improvements
  • pref: replace picomatch.makeRe with RE.toRegExp for pattern matching by @​Rel1cx in #​1055

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.45.2...v1.45.3

v1.45.2

Compare Source

🪄 Improvements

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.45.1...v1.45.2

v1.45.1

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.45.0...v1.45.1

v1.45.0

Compare Source

✨ New

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.44.0...v1.45.0

v1.43.0

Compare Source

✨ New

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.42.1...v1.43.0

v1.42.1

Compare Source

✨ New
📝 Changes you should be aware of

The following presets have been renamed:

  • core to x
  • core-legacy to x-legacy

The old preset names will still be available until the next major update to avoid breaking changes.

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.41.0...v1.42.1

v1.42.0

Compare Source

v1.41.0

Compare Source

✨ New

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.40.4...1.41.0

v1.40.4

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.40.3...v1.40.4

v1.40.3

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.40.2...v1.40.3

v1.40.2

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
🪄 Improvements

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.40.1...v1.40.2

v1.40.1

Compare Source

✨ New

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.40.0...v1.40.1

v1.40.0

Compare Source

✨ New

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.38.4...v1.40.0

v1.38.4

Compare Source

🪄 Improvements
  • chore: update default React version to 19.1.0 in documentation and settings by @​Rel1cx in #​1023

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.38.3...v1.38.4

v1.38.3

Compare Source

🪄 Improvements

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.38.2...v1.38.3

v1.38.2

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix(eslint-plugin): disable prefer-shorthand-* rules in all config by @​Rel1cx in a9e6ef9

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.38.0...v1.38.2

v1.38.1

Compare Source

v1.38.0

Compare Source

✨ New
🪄 Improvements
  • refactor: undeprecate jsx-uses-vars and jsx-no-duplicate-props rules by @​Rel1cx in #​1017

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.37.3...v1.38.0

v1.37.3

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: the requested module ts-api-utils does not provide an export named unionConstituents, closes #​1009 by @​Rel1cx in #​1010

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.37.2...v1.37.3

v1.37.2

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.37.1...v1.37.2

v1.37.1

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: enhance hooks-extra/prefer-use-state-lazy-initialization to correctly detect other hooks called within useState(...) by @​Rel1cx in #​1006
🪄 Improvements

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.37.0...v1.37.1

v1.37.0

Compare Source

🪄 Improvements
  • refactor: remove hooks-extra/prefer-use-state-lazy-initialization from recommended presets by @​Rel1cx in #​1001

    Based on feedback of this rule, the current implementation produces more false positives than expected, so to ensure the overall quality of the rules in the recommended presets we provide, I'm removing it from the presets for now, and should add it back after we implement a better heuristic for deciding which function calls should be allowed.

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.36.3...v1.37.0

v1.36.3

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: hooks-extra/prefer-use-state-lazy-initialization false positive on useState(use(promise)) closes #​999 by @​Rel1cx in #​1000

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.36.2...v1.36.3

v1.36.2

Compare Source

No notable changes have been made in this release.

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.36.1...v1.36.2

v1.36.1

Compare Source

🪄 Improvements

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.35.0...v1.36.1

v1.35.0

Compare Source

✨ New
  • feat(plugins/dom): add no-render rule to replace ReactDOM.render() with createRoot(node).render(), closes #​972 by @​Rel1cx in #​993
  • feat(plugins/dom): add no-hydrate rule to replace ReactDOM.hydrate() with hydrateRoot(), closes #​973 by @​Rel1cx in #​995
🪄 Improvements
  • refactor: rename hooks-extra/no-useless-custom-hooks to hooks-extra/no-unnecessary-use-prefix by @​Rel1cx in #​996
📝 Changes you should be aware of

The following rules have been renamed:

  • hooks-extra/no-useless-custom-hooks to hooks-extra/no-unnecessary-use-prefix
  • @eslint-react/hooks-extra/no-useless-custom-hooks to @eslint-react/hooks-extra/no-unnecessary-use-prefix

The old rule names will still be available until the next major update to avoid breaking changes.

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.34.1...v1.35.0

v1.34.1

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: false positive in no-context-provider on symbols named Provider which are imported from third-party libs, closes #​991 by @​Rel1cx in #​992

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.34.0...v1.34.1

v1.34.0

Compare Source

🪄 Improvements
  • refactor: export the create function of each rule by @​Rel1cx in #​989
  • refactor(plugins/x): rename no-nested-components rule to no-nested-component-definitions and update related docs by @​Rel1cx in #​990
📝 Changes you should be aware of

The following rules have been renamed:

  • no-nested-components to no-nested-component-definitions
  • @eslint-react/no-nested-components to @eslint-react/no-nested-component-definitions

The old rule names will still be available until the next major update to avoid breaking changes.

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.33.0...v1.34.0

v1.33.0

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix: update rule severity for no-flush-sync and no-void-elements-with-children in recommended presets by @​Rel1cx in #​988
🪄 Improvements
  • refactor(plugins/x): rename ensure-forward-ref-using-ref to no-useless-forward-ref by @​Rel1cx in #​987
📝 Changes you should be aware of

The following rules have been renamed:

  • ensure-forward-ref-using-ref to no-useless-forward-ref
  • @eslint-react/ensure-forward-ref-using-ref to @eslint-react/no-useless-forward-ref

The old rule names will still be available until the next major update to avoid breaking changes.

Full Changelog: Rel1cx/eslint-react@v1.32.1...v1.33.0

v1.32.1

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

v1.32.0

Compare Source

✨ New
🪄 Improvements

v1.31.0

Compare Source

✨ New
🪄 Improvements

v1.30.2

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix(plugins/hooks-extra): misidentification of set function in IIFE inside of hooks as its inside of useEffect, useLayoutEffect, closes #​967 by @​Rel1cx in #​968

v1.30.1

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
🪄 Improvements
New Contributors

v1.30.0

Compare Source

✨ New
  • feat: add naming-convention/use-state and naming-convention/context-name to recommended presets by @​Rel1cx in #​956
🐞 Fixes
  • fix: correct readonly checks and test cases in prefer-read-only-props by @​Rel1cx in #​957
  • fix: rework naming-convention/component-name rule to follow eslint-plugin-react-hooks@5.0 by @​Rel1cx in #​959

    Component names now need to start with an uppercase letter instead of a non-lowercase letter. This means _Button or _component are no longer valid.

  • fix: naming-convention/use-state fails with multiple words, closes #​960 by @​Rel1cx in #​961

v1.29.0

Compare Source

✨ New
🐞 Fixes
🪄 Improvements
New Contributors

v1.28.0

Compare Source

✨ New
🪄 Improvements

v1.27.0

Compare Source

✨ New
🪄 Improvements

v1.26.2

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes
  • fix(plugins/x): enhance no-context-provider rule to include context name in error messages by @​Rel1cx in #​935

v1.26.1

Compare Source

No notable changes have been made in this release.

v1.26.0

Compare Source

✨ New

v1.25.0

Compare Source

✨ New
🐞 Fixes
🪄 Improvements

v1.24.1

Compare Source

🐞 Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge April 30, 2026 01:05
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Error Error Jun 11, 2026 6:41pm
hashdotdesign-tokens Error Error Jun 11, 2026 6:41pm
petrinaut Error Error Comment Jun 11, 2026 6:41pm

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Dependency-only, but eslint-import-resolver-node 0.4.0 is a breaking resolver change and large jumps in eslint-plugin-react-x / eslint-plugin-react-hooks may surface new or changed lint failures in CI.

Overview
Bumps ESLint-related devDependency versions across the monorepo; there are no application or ESLint config source changes in the diff.

@local/eslint updates shared lint tooling: eslint-config-flat-gitignore (2.2.1 → 2.3.0), eslint-import-resolver-node (0.3.9 → 0.4.0), eslint-plugin-react-hooks (7.0.1 → 7.1.1), and eslint-plugin-storybook (10.3.1 → 10.4.1). apps/hash-frontend separately bumps eslint-plugin-react-x (1.17.2 → 1.53.1). @hashintel/query-editor and @hashintel/type-editor align their direct eslint-plugin-storybook devDependency to 10.4.1.

The notable upstream change is eslint-import-resolver-node 0.4.0, which now resolves package exports by default and may shift import/* rule behavior until lockfiles are refreshed and CI lint is re-run.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 13a1886. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team area/apps > hash.design Affects the `hash.design` design site (app) labels Apr 30, 2026
@augmentcode

augmentcode Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR updates ESLint-related npm dependencies used across the monorepo.

Changes:

  • Bumps eslint-plugin-storybook from 10.3.1 to 10.3.5 in several packages
  • Updates eslint-config-flat-gitignore from 2.2.1 to 2.3.0 in @local/eslint
  • Updates eslint-import-resolver-node from 0.3.9 to 0.3.10 in @local/eslint
  • Regenerates yarn.lock to reflect the updated dependency graph

Technical Notes: Versions remain pinned/consistent across the shared ESLint config package and consuming packages to keep linting behavior aligned.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

@augmentcode augmentcode Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks


Comparing deps/js/eslint-npm-packages (0953197) with main (3ec4a42)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (79eda1e) during the generation of this report, so 3ec4a42 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.49%. Comparing base (adb5688) to head (0953197).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8677      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.50%   62.49%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1318     1318              
  Lines      134234   134234              
  Branches     5520     5520              
==========================================
- Hits        83906    83893      -13     
- Misses      49415    49426      +11     
- Partials      913      915       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.18% <ø> (-0.21%) ⬇️
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 26.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 92.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@graphite-app graphite-app Bot requested review from a team April 30, 2026 01:30
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 137 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.577 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.017 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.642 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.788 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$22.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 135 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.853 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.52 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.373 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$4.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.902 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$3.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.778 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.074 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$1.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.330 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.807 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.63 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.112 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.03 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.500 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.146 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.755 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.670 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.591 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$50.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.210 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$40.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.755 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$44.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.519 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$48.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.30 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$56.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$57.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 409 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$48.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.991 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$93.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.718 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$40.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$249 \mathrm{ms} \pm 649 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.024 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$18.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.368 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$18.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.630 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.867 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 141 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.765 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.288 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$34.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 240 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$32.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.029 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$33.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.983 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$32.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$6.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.483 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$95.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 546 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.391 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 417 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 431 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.563 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 504 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.161 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 410 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.093 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 513 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.274 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 423 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.332 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$166 \mathrm{ms} \pm 548 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 841 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$37.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$513 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.24 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

lunelson
lunelson previously approved these changes Apr 30, 2026

@lunelson lunelson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should work fine

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 30, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Apr 30, 2026
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge April 30, 2026 11:15
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/js/eslint-npm-packages branch from 0953197 to 2654f44 Compare April 30, 2026 11:15
@hash-worker

hash-worker Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: yarn.lock
error This project's package.json defines "packageManager": "yarn@4.16.0". However the current global version of Yarn is 1.22.22.

Presence of the "packageManager" field indicates that the project is meant to be used with Corepack, a tool included by default with all official Node.js distributions starting from 16.9 and 14.19.
Corepack must currently be enabled by running corepack enable in your terminal. For more information, check out https://yarnpkg.com/corepack.

Comment thread libs/@local/eslint/package.json Outdated
"eslint-plugin-react-hooks": "7.0.1",
"eslint-plugin-storybook": "10.3.1",
"eslint-plugin-react-hooks": "7.1.1",
"eslint-plugin-storybook": "10.4.0",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Storybook plugin version mismatches PR description target

Medium Severity

eslint-plugin-storybook is updated to 10.4.0 across all three package.json files, but the PR description specifies the target version as 10.3.6. Version 10.4.0 is a minor version bump (not a patch), and the PR's release notes only cover changes up to 10.3.6, meaning any breaking changes or new behaviors in 10.3.710.4.0 have not been reviewed.

Additional Locations (2)
Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 7a89f6c. Configure here.

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

There are 2 total unresolved issues (including 1 from previous review).

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9e75051. Configure here.

"eslint-config-prettier": "10.1.8",
"eslint-config-sheriff": "31.3.0",
"eslint-import-resolver-node": "0.3.9",
"eslint-import-resolver-node": "0.4.0",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wrong version: 0.4.0 instead of intended 0.3.10

Medium Severity

The PR description explicitly states eslint-import-resolver-node should update from 0.3.90.3.10 (a patch bump), but the actual change specifies 0.4.0 — a minor version bump that switches the underlying resolve dependency from ^1.22.4 to ^2.0.0-next.7 (a pre-release major version). This introduces a breaking change where preserveSymlinks defaults to false instead of true, potentially altering module resolution behavior during linting. The intended safe patch update became an unintended breaking upgrade.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9e75051. Configure here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants