.github/workflows: Use supported Blacksmith runners - #5
Conversation
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: serverGenReqId_12e6bc18-b352-4904-ad53-850659b9d320) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Stale comment
Not approved: Cursor Bugbot was present but skipped after hitting a usage/spend limit, so the required automated review did not complete successfully. Human review is needed; no reviewers were assigned because the only repository collaborator is the PR author.
Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: acbc3f2938
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: serverGenReqId_3b029dd9-2789-4c8a-b818-c9f71281a4ad) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Stale comment
Not approved: Cursor Bugbot was present but skipped after a usage/spend limit, so the required automated review did not complete successfully. Human review is needed; no reviewers were assigned because the only repository collaborator is the PR author.
Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: serverGenReqId_3e82180d-5074-41a0-9c02-0ae14266bda4) |
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: serverGenReqId_ebbbba72-f65f-4d44-b864-00f59d9b51a0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not approved: Cursor Bugbot was present but skipped after a usage/spend limit, so the required automated review did not complete successfully. Human review is needed; no reviewers were assigned because the only repository collaborator is the PR author.
Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver


Summary
Evidence
git diff --checkactionlintwith repository custom labels configured where requiredNeed help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need. Autofix is disabled.Note
Low Risk
CI and documentation-only runner migration plus a patch Go toolchain version bump; no application or security logic changes.
Overview
Moves macOS GitHub Actions jobs from GitHub-hosted
macos-15to theblacksmith-6vcpu-macos-latestrunner label across CI (test,lint,govulncheck,actionlint, GoReleaser check), release (validate,publish), and the manual privileged macOS integration workflow.Registers that label in
.github/actionlint.yamlso workflow linting accepts the custom runner. Updatesdocs/pki-service.mdto describe the privileged integration job as running on a fresh Blacksmith Apple Silicon macOS runner instead of GitHub-hosted macOS.Bumps the module
godirective ingo.modfrom 1.26.5 to 1.26.6; workflow steps and commands are otherwise unchanged.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 221cc1e. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.