Add regression test: #10043, backtick should not report unexpected keyword#19476
Open
Add regression test: #10043, backtick should not report unexpected keyword#19476
Conversation
T-Gro
added
NO_RELEASE_NOTES
Contributor
|
Member
|
The backticks cases were added in the previous PRs. It's more interesting to see if there are any |
T-Gro
force-pushed
the
regression-test/issue10043
branch
from
ea3d696 to
f498636
Compare
Tests that invalid characters in type annotation positions produce clear error messages instead of confusing 'Unexpected reserved keyword': - backtick: FS3563 'This is not a valid identifier' - @: FS0615 'Unexpected infix operator in type expression' Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
T-Gro
force-pushed
the
regression-test/issue10043
branch
from
f498636 to
e7b6ee5
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a regression test for #10043
Verifies that
let i:float1 = 3.0` produces FS3563 ("This is not a valid identifier") instead of the previous confusing "Unexpected reserved keyword" message.Fixes #10043