### Additional Contract Information - [x] Is the rate provider reporting for a stable coin/FX/Yield tracking? - [ ] Is the rate provider reporting a market rate? - [x] Is a combined rate provider needed (i.e. wstETH in aave)? - [ ] Does this rate provider pertain to an ERC4626 contract? - [ ] If so, is the intention for this ERC4626 asset to be boosted? - [ ] If so, is the Buffer already initialized - [ ] If so, shall the underlying asset be used to add/remove liquidity in a pool if possible? (i.e. add USDC for waUSDC) - [ ] If so, shall the wrapped asset also be used to add/remove liquidity in a pool? (i.e. add waUSDC directly) ### Network hyperEvm ### Rate provider contract address 0xeC8e3f795b28E86967265A4c4715aB609CBDe68d ### Asset contract address 0xb83d27f0f4133a7b0377a88089583131a903fdc7 ### audits https://github.com/treehouse-gaia/audit-report ### Protocol Documentation https://docs.treehouse.finance/protocol ### ERC4626 Asset contract address _No response_ ### ERC4626 Asset contract audits _No response_ ### ERC4626 Asset contract documentation _No response_ ### Link to passing fork tests _No response_ ### Terms and Conditions - [x] The protocol to be integrated has been audited by at least one security firm or independent researcher. - [x] If deployed, the contract & all involved downstream contracts are verified on etherscan. - [x] The contract does not rely upon an EOA to supply any critical data (e.g., price). - [x] If upgradeable, the contract's administrator is not an EOA.
Activity
Merge pull request #790 from balancer/review/issue-789