changelog: v2 releases have no published release notes

[TheForgivenOne]

Description

The published changelog only covers v1. The newest entry is v1.18.33 (Sep 28, 2026), and there are no entries for any v2.0.x release, so v2 users have no published release notes.

v2.0.20 has a GitHub release whose body is only release: v2.0.20 — no notes. And https://opencode.ai/v2/changelog returns 404.

I wanted to see what changed in v2.0.20 and had to diff the tags myself (v2.0.19...v2.0.20 via the compare API: 31 commits, 179 files).

Environment

• opencode version: 2.0.20 (channel: latest)
• OS: Debian 13 (trixie), Linux 6.12.107 x86_64
• Terminal: xterm-256color, COLORTERM=truecolor
• Shell: /bin/bash
• Active plugins: opencode-memento, opencode2-skill-creator, opencode-awake, @tarquinen/opencode-dcp@3.2.0

Steps to reproduce

1. opencode --version reports opencode v2.0.20
2. Open https://opencode.ai/changelog
3. The most recent entry is v1.18.33 (Sep 28, 2026). No v2.0.x entries appear anywhere on the page
4. Open https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/releases/tag/v2.0.20 — the release body is only release: v2.0.20
5. Open https://opencode.ai/v2/changelog — returns 404

Expected Behavior

v2 releases appear in the changelog with the same Core / TUI / Desktop breakdown the v1 entries use, or the GitHub release body carries the notes.

Actual Behavior

No published notes exist for any v2.0.x release. The only way to find out what changed is to diff tags (git log v2.0.19..v2.0.20, or the GitHub compare API).

Additional Context

Both lines appear to be in active maintenance — the v1.18.24 notes mention "V1 now reads supported V2 config fields" — so the single changelog silently omits all v2 work.

For scale, v2.0.20 alone is 31 commits across 179 files, including user-visible changes: a separate ChatGPT token-sharing OAuth method, new opencode auth export / auth import commands, changed permission-rejection behavior in opencode run, provider response bodies preserved in session errors, and database files restricted to their owner.

Not urgent — I worked around it with the compare API. Reporting because the changelog reads as though development stopped at v1, and gives no hint that a v2 track exists.

[github-actions]

---

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

• #50345: No offical release notes for 2.x.x — reports the same lack of official release notes for v2 releases.

[IntegerAlex]

Yes man they give daily update without notes. Like how would i know what changed or fixed? @opencode-agent

[HUMORCE]

https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/commits/v2.0.24/ Might help.

[ortunom]

https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/commits/v2.0.24/ Might help.

IMHO, that's not the point, of course you can go and check individual commits, you can also diff with previous version. But nowadays generating some decent changelog notes is a matter of seconds using AI, so I can't really understand why is not enforced in this project.

[BreakBB]

I was also very confused that there are no GitHub releases for the v2 versions. I wasn't even aware there actually is an opencode v2 at all.

[IntegerAlex]

I was also very confused that there are no GitHub releases for the v2 versions. I wasn't even aware there actually is an opencode v2 at all.

Yes. It also breaks, consumes too much memory. I guess because of daemon architecture it keeps running in background. Release notes should be there.

[austinbutler]

There's a lot of confusion as to whether V2 is "out" or still in beta. The website defaults to V2 install. They are tagging v2 releases without any sort of beta indicator. Lots of people claim it's still in beta, but I can't find anything official.

[nathan-chappell]

Well, my team wants me to use opencode for use with local llms because we have sensitive data blah blah blah. I'm trying to give an assessment of opencode and as far as I can tell V2 is still a beta (or alpha, or maybe still properly in development), and the state of the project is somewhat concerning. I would honestly feel better if we had a v2-beta version to play with if we want, but v1 was being maintained as stable, but this just makes everything seem disorganized and makes me hesitate using this project for serious things.

[IntegerAlex]

Well, my team wants me to use opencode for use with local llms because we have sensitive data blah blah blah. I'm trying to give an assessment of opencode and as far as I can tell V2 is still a beta (or alpha, or maybe still properly in development), and the state of the project is somewhat concerning. I would honestly feel better if we had a v2-beta version to play with if we want, but v1 was being maintained as stable, but this just makes everything seem disorganized and makes me hesitate using this project for serious things.

100%
generally concerned! Pushing v2 but not ack that it breaking no release notes.