Repository navigation
check formatting in ci and add a status badge - #5
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the repository had drifted out of ruff format for two months without anyone
noticing, because ci ran tests and lint but never checked formatting. the
existing
formattask writes files, so it cannot gate; aformat-checktaskis added alongside it.
ruff format .applied once across the repository, as its own commit. thechange is provably cosmetic: the ast and the full comment sequence of all four
touched files are identical before and after.
reports in seconds rather than after the suite.
cannot burn six hours, plus a concurrency group that cancels superseded pull
request runs and a read-only token scope.