Skip to content

test: Add more test cases for strUnHex#7626

Open
kuznetsss wants to merge 2 commits into
XRPLF:developfrom
kuznetsss:Add_tests_for_string_unhex
Open

test: Add more test cases for strUnHex#7626
kuznetsss wants to merge 2 commits into
XRPLF:developfrom
kuznetsss:Add_tests_for_string_unhex

Conversation

@kuznetsss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

High Level Overview of Change

Add more test cases for strUnHex().

Context of Change

API Impact

  • Public API: New feature (new methods and/or new fields)
  • Public API: Breaking change (in general, breaking changes should only impact the next api_version)
  • libxrpl change (any change that may affect libxrpl or dependents of libxrpl)
  • Peer protocol change (must be backward compatible or bump the peer protocol version)

@kuznetsss kuznetsss requested review from bthomee and vvysokikh1 June 25, 2026 14:07
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.0%. Comparing base (07c64f0) to head (b17521b).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #7626     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     82.0%   82.0%   -0.0%     
=========================================
  Files         1007    1007             
  Lines        76890   76890             
  Branches      8971    8971             
=========================================
- Hits         63050   63043      -7     
- Misses       13831   13838      +7     
  Partials         9       9             

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant