Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
anegg0
marked this pull request as draft
April 23, 2026 18:25
Stub for the ArbOS 60 priority-fee collection feature. Real content to follow from SME (Vanessa Bridge) once drafted in Notion. Note: feature requires a separate Constitutional vote to activate.
… (ArbOS 60) Placeholder tracking branch for edits-existing content. Rory Neithinger will push changes to existing Stylus pages here once scope is defined (see Notion page for acceptance criteria).
Replaces the stub with the SME-drafted content covering: - Activation gate (Constitutional vote requirement) as prominent caution - ArbOwner.setCollectTips() usage - Activation/receipt timing caveat (known issue when enabling mid-block) - The two requirements for tip-based ordering (collection + sequencer logic) - References to the Constitutional AIP and ArbOwner source Source: https://www.notion.so/arbitrum/Priority-fees-collection-ArbOS-60-34b01a3f59f8814ea643e85330c90c56 Awaiting Vanessa's review on the MDX rendering before flipping out of draft.
Added section on deploying contracts larger than 24 KB, detailing fragmentation process and activation.
Add information about fragmented contracts and their activation costs.
Added information about contract size limits and reactivation requirements for Stylus contracts.
Added note about contract size limits and deployment behavior.
Added detailed information about breaking changes in ArbOS 60, specifically regarding the removal of WASM multi-value support and its implications for Stylus contracts.
Clarified the impact of ArbOS 60 on multi-value contracts and updated instructions for recompilation.
Clarify the breaking change regarding WASM multi-value support in ArbOS 60.
…ring-sanctioned-address-chain-owner-guide P4 Compliance Filtering chain-owner guide (TW-739)
…t-wasm-multi-value-removal
Updated availability version for compliance filtering components to ArbOS 61 Elara.
…mpliance-filtering.mdx
Removed compliance filtering documentation from sidebar.
…t-wasm-multi-value-removal
…priority-fees.mdx Co-authored-by: Pete <petevielhaber@gmail.com>
…priority-fees.mdx Co-authored-by: Pete <petevielhaber@gmail.com>
…priority-fees.mdx Co-authored-by: Pete <petevielhaber@gmail.com>
…priority-fees.mdx Co-authored-by: Pete <petevielhaber@gmail.com>
…on-new-page' into tw-740-p5-priority-fees-collection-new-page # Conflicts: # docs/launch-arbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common/gas/priority-fees.mdx
This PR deletes docs/arbitrum-essentials/how-to-get-l2block-on-l1.mdx
("How to verify child chain state on the parent chain") and removed its
inbound redirect. Both URLs currently return 200 in production, so the
deletion would turn two live pages into 404s:
/arbitrum-essentials/how-to-get-l2block-on-l1
/build-decentralized-apps/how-to-get-l2block-on-l1
Point both at /how-arbitrum-works/deep-dives/assertions, which documents
the assertion mechanism the retired guide relied on.
Placed in the manual section above the AUTO-GENERATED markers so
`yarn move-doc` does not overwrite them. vercel.json is intentionally
left alone: it is already modified on Arbos60, and regenerating it here
would risk a merge conflict in a generated file. The client-redirects
plugin serves these from redirects.config.js at build time.
Arbos60 restructured docs/launch-arbitrum-chain: 02-configure-your-chain/ was removed and the cost docs now live in chain-config/costs/. This branch added priority-fees.mdx into the retired directory, leaving it the only file there while its five sibling Gas sidebar entries already pointed at chain-config/costs/ (c0f5372). Merging as-is auto-resurrected the retired directory without a conflict and still built green, so CI could not catch it -- the page would have published at the retired /launch-arbitrum-chain/configure-your-chain/ common/gas/priority-fees URL, isolated from its siblings. Move the file and update the one stale sidebar id. No link edits needed: the page uses absolute doc links only. No redirect needed either, since the old path was never published.
Address vbridge-hash's review on PR #3236: - The admonition claimed the Constitutional vote applies to both Arbitrum One and Nova. Priority fee collection is Arbitrum One only, so scope the vote to One and state that Nova is excluded. - The fallback ordering rules listed only Timeboost. Name first-come, first-served as well, matching the wording in how-arbitrum-works/deep-dives/gas-and-fees.mdx.
…llection-new-page P5 Priority fees page (TW-740)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is the main branch into which all Arbos60 PRs will merge.
Please do not change or merge this PR.