Skip to content

[16.0][IMP] shopfloor: cluster picking, option to disable location-based move selection - #1247

Open
nicolas-delbovier-acsone wants to merge 1 commit into
OCA:16.0from
acsone:16.0-imp-shopfloor-cluster-picking-disable-location-based-move-selection
Open

[16.0][IMP] shopfloor: cluster picking, option to disable location-based move selection#1247
nicolas-delbovier-acsone wants to merge 1 commit into
OCA:16.0from
acsone:16.0-imp-shopfloor-cluster-picking-disable-location-based-move-selection

Conversation

@nicolas-delbovier-acsone

@nicolas-delbovier-acsone nicolas-delbovier-acsone commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem / Business Need

In standard cluster picking operations, scanning a location barcode infers and validates/selects the move planned at that location.

However, in real-world warehouse environments, stock discrepancies frequently occur (e.g., an operator physically placed Lot B at a bin while Odoo expects Lot A, or misidentified products are stored in the location). When location scanning auto-selects the move, operators unknowingly validate incorrect physical movements without realizing a mismatch exists between physical stock and Odoo's inventory state.

To enforce strict inventory control and force immediate discrepancy detection, warehouse managers need a way to require operators to explicitly scan the product, lot, or package barcode rather than relying on location inference.

cc @jbaudoux

@OCA-git-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @guewen, @simahawk, @sebalix,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@jbaudoux jbaudoux left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think bypassing the confirmation of the location is a good idea. Why not just enabling the existing option scan location first? You should then have to still scan the product. Needs testing it works properly in this scenario with qty prefill, but the purpose was this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants