feat: Add training data transparency flags with HF Hub verification#81
Open
adityamulik wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
feat: Add training data transparency flags with HF Hub verification#81adityamulik wants to merge 1 commit into
adityamulik wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Author
|
Example of a model with available datasets |
Author
|
one example where dataset is linked, but the data doesn't exists |
Collaborator
|
Please open PR to target branch v0.2 |
adityamulik
force-pushed
the
feat/training-data-transparency
branch
from
c803d7e to
95b2bb3
Compare
Author
|
@eaglei15 - yes, I have updated the PR to open it against v0.2 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
feat: Add training data transparency flags with HF Hub verification
Problem
Currently, the AIBOM generator cannot distinguish between models where:
This creates a transparency gap where users cannot reliably audit models for complete documentation.
Reference: #80