Semantic Network Diagnostic Tool
Network-Pinpointer maps network operations to a four-dimensional semantic space (Connectivity, Security, Performance, Visibility), enabling unprecedented insights into network infrastructure through semantic analysis.
TL;DR: Semantic network analysis tool. Maps operations to 4D LJPW space. Think: tcpdump + nmap + topology discovery + semantic clustering.
# Installation
git clone https://github.com/BruinGrowly/Network-Pinpointer.git
cd Network-Pinpointer
pip install pyyaml scapy # Core + packet capture
# Quick diagnostics
./pinpoint ping 8.8.8.8 # Semantic ping analysis
./pinpoint scan 192.168.1.1 -p 1-1024 # Port scan with classification
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24 # Full network topology + clustering
# Advanced analysis
./pinpoint ljpw api.example.com --deep # Comprehensive semantic profiling
./pinpoint ice "intent" "context" "execution" # Harmony analysisWhat makes it different:
- Maps every network operation to semantic coordinates (L, J, P, W)
- Clusters devices by purpose (connectivity, security, performance, monitoring)
- Detects architectural smells and semantic mismatches
- Interactive HTML visualizations with pathfinding and analytics
What is this? A network diagnostic tool that understands what devices and operations do, not just if they work.
Why use it?
- Automatically categorizes network devices by purpose
- Finds security issues and optimization opportunities
- Beautiful visualizations you can interact with
- Helps you understand your network's architecture
Basic workflow:
# 1. Install (minimal setup)
git clone https://github.com/BruinGrowly/Network-Pinpointer.git
cd Network-Pinpointer
pip install pyyaml
# 2. Learn the framework
./pinpoint explain ljpw
# 3. Test your first device
./pinpoint ping google.com
# 4. Scan your network (replace with your subnet)
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24
# 5. Open the HTML visualization (found in output/)
# Browse to see interactive network topology!Need help? Run ./pinpoint --help or ./pinpoint explain <topic>
Every network operation maps to four dimensions:
| Dimension | What It Measures | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity (L) | Reachability, communication, service sharing | Web servers, VPNs, load balancers |
| Security (J) | Access control, policies, rules, compliance | Firewalls, auth servers, ACLs |
| Performance (P) | Speed, capacity, execution | App servers, databases, compute nodes |
| Visibility (W) | Monitoring, diagnostics, observability | SNMP, log servers, monitoring tools |
Example coordinates:
ping 8.8.8.8β(L=0.29, J=0.14, P=0.00, W=0.57)β Visibility-dominant (monitoring operation)configure firewall deny allβ(L=0.05, J=0.60, P=0.30, W=0.05)β Security-dominant (access control)
Measures Intent-Context-Execution harmony to detect mismatches:
Intent: "provide fast database access"
Context: "high-latency network with limited bandwidth"
Execution: "deploy mysql over unoptimized tcp"
Result: Low harmony β performance issues likely
| Option | Use Case | Install Command |
|---|---|---|
| Core CLI | Basic diagnostics | pip install pyyaml |
| + Packet Capture | Deep analysis | pip install pyyaml scapy |
| Full Stack | Production + API + monitoring | pip install -r requirements.txt |
Linux/macOS:
git clone https://github.com/BruinGrowly/Network-Pinpointer.git
cd Network-Pinpointer
pip install pyyaml scapy # Recommended
chmod +x pinpoint
./pinpoint --helpWindows:
git clone https://github.com/BruinGrowly/Network-Pinpointer.git
cd Network-Pinpointer
pip install pyyaml scapy
# Install Npcap: https://npcap.com/#download
python pinpoint --helpFull guide: WINDOWS_INSTALLATION.md
cp .env.example .env
docker-compose up -d
# Access:
# - API: http://localhost:8080
# - Grafana: http://localhost:3000 (admin/admin123)
# - Prometheus: http://localhost:9090Verify installation:
./pinpoint version
./pinpoint explain ljpw
SKIP_FIRST_RUN=1 ./pinpoint health- Semantic Ping: Connectivity tests with LJPW coordinate analysis
- Semantic Traceroute: Path tracing with semantic interpretation
- Port Scanning: Service discovery mapped to semantic space
- Network Mapping: Subnet scanning with clustering by purpose
- LJPW Semantic Probe: Comprehensive profiling (archetype matching, purpose inference)
- ICE Framework: Intent-Context-Execution harmony measurement
- Architectural Smell Detection: Identify anti-patterns and misconfigurations
- Network Optimization: Recommendations based on semantic disharmony
- Topology Clustering: Automatic grouping by semantic purpose
- REST API: FastAPI server with full semantic analysis endpoints
- Prometheus Metrics: Real-time monitoring integration
- JSON Export: All analysis results exportable for integration
- Interactive Visualizations: Self-contained HTML with advanced features
All visualizations are self-contained HTML files with:
- β Dark/Light themes
- β Interactive filtering and search
- β Export capabilities (JSON/CSV/PNG)
- β Keyboard shortcuts
- β LocalStorage persistence
- β No server required - works offline
CLI Command:
# Generate 3D cluster visualization
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24
# Output includes HTML file
# β Network mapped and visualized: output/cluster_map.htmlCLI Output:
π Scanning network: 192.168.1.0/24
======================================================================
β
Scanned 254 hosts, 12 reachable
π Connectivity Cluster (5 devices) - Cohesion: 87%
π Security Cluster (3 devices) - Cohesion: 92%
β‘ Performance Cluster (2 devices) - Cohesion: 78%
π Visibility Cluster (2 devices) - Cohesion: 95%
π Visualization saved: output/cluster_map.html
HTML Visualization Mockup:
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β π― Semantic Cluster Map [π Theme] [πΎ Export] β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β Control Panel β 3D Visualization β
β ββββββββββββββββ β β
β β π Search β β β β
β β [ ] β β β β (google.com) β
β ββββββββββββββββ€ β β Connectivity: 0.65 β
β β ποΈ Filters β β β β Security: 0.12 β
β β Connect:ββββ β β β Performance: 0.10 β
β β Securityββββ β β β Visibility: 0.13 β
β β Perform:ββββ β β β β
β β Visible:ββββ β β β β
β β Mass: ββββ β β β (firewall) β
β ββββββββββββββββ€ β β β β
β β π Stats β β Color-coded by dimension: β
β β Nodes: 12 β β Red=Connectivity Blue=Securityβ
β β Filtered: 12 β β Orange=Perform Purple=Visible β
β β Connect: 5 β β β
β β Security: 3 β β [Interactive 3D - Drag to β
β β Perform: 2 β β rotate, scroll to zoom] β
β β Visible: 2 β β β
β ββββββββββββββββ β β
β β β
β Keyboard: F=Fullscreen R=Reset H=Hide E=Export T=Theme β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Interactive Features:
- Drag to rotate the 3D space
- Click nodes to see details
- Use sliders to filter dimensions in real-time
- Search for specific targets
- Export filtered data or screenshot
CLI Command:
# Generate comprehensive dashboard
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24
# Or analyze specific targets
./pinpoint ljpw google.com github.com api.example.com
./pinpoint visualize dashboard
# Output: output/dashboard.htmlCLI Output:
β Dashboard created with 12 targets
β AI insights generated: 5 recommendations
π Visualization saved: output/dashboard.html
HTML Visualization Mockup:
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β π Network Semantic Dashboard [π‘ Insights] [πΎ Export] β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β [π Search: ____] [Posture: All βΌ] [Dimension: All βΌ] [βοΈ Config] β
β β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β βTarget β² β L β J β P β W β Mass β Posture βDimensionββ
β βββββββββββββββΌββββββΌββββββΌββββββΌββββββΌβββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββ€β
β βgoogle.com β0.65 β0.12 β0.10 β0.13 β 842 βProactiveβConnect ββ
β βfirewall.lo β0.05 β0.75 β0.15 β0.05 β 1205 βDefensiveβSecurity ββ
β βdb-server β0.08 β0.10 β0.72 β0.10 β 956 βProactiveβPerform ββ
β βmonitor.sys β0.10 β0.08 β0.05 β0.77 β 634 βReactive βVisible ββ
β βweb-lb β0.68 β0.10 β0.18 β0.04 β 789 βProactiveβConnect ββ
β βauth-server β0.12 β0.70 β0.12 β0.06 β 1050 βDefensiveβSecurity ββ
β β... β... β... β... β... β ... β... β... ββ
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β
β π‘ AI Insights: β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β β’ Security Gap: firewall.lo has high Security but cluster lacksββ
β β redundancy. Consider backup security gateway. ββ
β β β’ Performance: db-server shows high Performance, suggesting ββ
β β opportunity for load distribution. ββ
β β β’ Balance: Network shows 42% Connectivity focus - well-linked ββ
β β but monitor security coverage. ββ
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β
β [Import Data] [Export JSON] [Export CSV] [Generate Report] β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Interactive Features:
- Click column headers to sort (ascending/descending)
- Filter by posture or dominant dimension
- Generate AI-powered insights
- Import/export data for custom analysis
- Config auto-saves to localStorage
CLI Commands:
# Establish baseline for a target
./pinpoint baseline google.com
# β Baseline established for google.com
# Wait some time (hours/days), then check drift
./pinpoint drift google.com
# Generate timeline visualization
./pinpoint visualize drift google.com
# Output: output/drift_timeline_google.com.htmlCLI Output:
π Analyzing drift for: google.com
======================================================================
Baseline: 2025-12-01 10:00:00 | L=0.65 J=0.12 P=0.10 W=0.13
Current: 2025-12-03 14:30:00 | L=0.62 J=0.15 P=0.12 W=0.11
π DRIFT ANALYSIS
Total drift distance: 0.052
Drift velocity: 0.021/day
Severity: Low (Normal)
Dimension changes:
Connectivity: -0.03 (β 4.6%)
Security: +0.03 (β 25.0%)
Performance: +0.02 (β 20.0%)
Visibility: -0.02 (β 15.4%)
π Timeline visualization: output/drift_timeline_google.com.html
HTML Visualization Mockup:
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β π Drift Timeline: google.com [π Annotate] [πΎ Export]β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β [π
From: 2025-12-01] [To: 2025-12-03] [View: All βΌ] [Analysis β]β
β β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β 1.0β ββ
β β β βββ Connectivity βββ Security ββ
β β0.8 β β β Performance Β·Β·Β· Visibility ββ
β β β ββ
β β0.6 ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ (Connectivity) ββ
β β β β ββ
β β0.4 β ββ
β β β ββ
β β0.2 β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββ (Security) ββ
β β β Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β·Β· (Visibility) ββ
β β0.0 ββ β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β (Performance) ββ
β β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β 12/01 12/02 π 12/03 ββ
β β Annotation: "Config change" ββ
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β
β π Statistics: π― Analysis: β
β Total Drift: 0.052 Trend: Increasing Security β
β Velocity: 0.021/day Pattern: Security enhancement β
β Duration: 2.2 days Severity: Low β
β Data Points: 48 Confidence: High β
β β
β π Annotations: β
β β’ 12/02 10:30 - "Firewall rules updated" β
β β’ 12/03 09:15 - "Load balancer added" β
β β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Interactive Features:
- Select date range with interactive pickers
- Add custom annotations (saved to localStorage)
- Toggle different view modes (All/LJPW/Mass/Harmony)
- Enable trend lines and moving averages
- Export timeline with annotations
CLI Commands:
# Analyze mass distribution across network
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24
./pinpoint visualize mass
# Or for specific targets
./pinpoint ljpw google.com github.com api.example.com
./pinpoint visualize mass
# Output: output/mass_distribution.htmlCLI Output:
π Mass Distribution Analysis
======================================================================
Targets analyzed: 12
Statistics:
Mean: 856.3
Median: 842.0
Std Dev: 198.4
Min: 634.0 (monitor.sys)
Max: 1205.0 (firewall.lo)
Outliers detected: 2
β’ firewall.lo (1205.0) - High outlier
β’ monitor.sys (634.0) - Low outlier
Correlation (mass vs harmony): 0.34 (weak positive)
π Visualization saved: output/mass_distribution.html
HTML Visualization Mockup:
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β π Mass Distribution Analysis [π Chart Type βΌ] [πΎ Export]β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β [Mass: 0βββββββββββββββββββ1200] [Category: All βΌ] [Harmony: β] β
β β
β Chart: [Histogram βΌ] (Pie | Scatter | Box Plot) β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β βββββ ββ
β β 6 β β ββ
β β 5 β β βββββ ββ
β β 4 β β β β ββ
β β 3 β β β β βββββ ββ
β β 2 β β β β β β βββββ βββββ ββ
β β 1 β β β β β β β β β β ββ
β β 0 βββββ΄βββββ΄ββββ΄βββββ΄ββββ΄βββββ΄ββββ΄ββββββββββ΄ββββ΄ββββββββββββββ
β β 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 ... 1100-1200 ββ
β β Low Medium High Outliers ββ
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β
β π Statistics: π Outliers (2): β
β Mean: 856.3 β’ firewall.lo 1205 β οΈ High β
β Median: 842.0 β’ monitor.sys 634 β οΈ Low β
β Std Dev: 198.4 β
β Correlation: 0.34 π‘ Recommendations: β
β β’ High-mass targets may benefit β
β Distribution: Normal from load distribution β
β Skew: 0.12 (slight right) β’ Consider consolidating low- β
β CV: 23.2% mass monitoring services β
β β
β [1] Histogram [2] Pie Chart [3] Scatter [4] Box Plot β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Interactive Features:
- Switch between 4 chart types (histogram, pie, scatter, box)
- Filter by mass range, category, or harmony level
- Automatic outlier detection with IQR method
- Get AI-powered recommendations
- Export statistics and visualizations
CLI Commands:
# Generate network topology graph
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24
./pinpoint visualize topology
# Graph includes all discovered devices and their relationships
# Output: output/topology_graph.htmlCLI Output:
πΊοΈ Generating network topology graph...
======================================================================
Nodes: 12 devices
Edges: 18 connections (similarity > 0.8)
Network Metrics:
Density: 0.273
Avg Degree: 3.00
Clustering: 0.418
π Topology visualization: output/topology_graph.html
HTML Visualization Mockup:
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β π Network Topology [π Layout βΌ] [πΎ Export] β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β Control Panel β 3D Network Graph β
β βββββββββββββββββββ β β
β β π Search β β β web-lb β
β β [ ] β β β±ββ² β
β βββββββββββββββββββ€ β β± β β² β
β β π― Filters β β β β β app-1 β
β β Dimension: AllβΌ β β β± β β² β
β β Threshold: 0.80 β β βββββββββββ db-server β
β β Min Mass: 0 β β β± β firewall β
β βββββββββββββββββββ€ β β β β
β β π Layout β β β β monitor β
β β [LJPW SpaceβΌ] β β β β±ββ² β
β β β’ Force β β β β± β β² β
β β β’ Circular β β β β β β β
β β β’ Hierarchical β β β β β
β βββββββββββββββββββ€ β ββββββββ auth β
β β πΊοΈ Path β β β
β β Source: web-lb β β [Interactive 3D - drag to rotate] β
β β Target: db β β Green edges = shortest path β
β β [Find Path] β β Node size = semantic mass β
β β Path: 3 hops β β Color = dominant dimension β
β β 1. web-lb β β β
β β 2. firewall β β Legend: π΄ Connect π΅ Security β
β β 3. db-server β β π Perform π£ Visible β
β βββββββββββββββββββ€ β β
β β π Metrics β β β
β β Nodes: 12 β β β
β β Edges: 18 β β β
β β Density: 0.273 β β β
β β Avg Deg: 3.00 β β β
β β Cluster: 0.418 β β β
β βββββββββββββββββββ β β
β β β
β Keyboard: F=Full R=Reset H=Hide E=Export T=Theme P=Path β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Interactive Features:
- Pathfinding: Click two nodes to find shortest path (Dijkstra algorithm)
- Multiple Layouts: Switch between LJPW Space, Force-Directed, Circular, Hierarchical
- Network Metrics: Real-time calculation of density, degree, clustering
- Filter by Dimension: Show only Connectivity, Security, Performance, or Visibility nodes
- Connection Threshold: Adjust similarity threshold for edges
- Path Highlighting: Shortest paths shown with bright green edges
Layout Examples:
LJPW Space (3D): Force-Directed: Circular:
Nodes positioned by Physics-based Evenly distributed
semantic coordinates organic layout around circle
W ββββ β
β β±β ββ² β± β²
β β β βββΌβββΌββ β β
LβββββββββJ ββ²ββ±β β β
β β β β β β
P β²ββ± β β
β β² β±
βββββ
Complete Workflow Example:
# 1. Scan your network
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24
# Outputs:
# β output/cluster_map.html - 3D semantic clusters
# β output/dashboard.html - Comprehensive overview
# β output/topology_graph.html - Network relationships
# β output/mass_distribution.html - Statistical analysis
# 2. Establish baselines for key targets
./pinpoint baseline 192.168.1.1 # Gateway
./pinpoint baseline 192.168.1.10 # Web server
./pinpoint baseline 192.168.1.50 # Database
# 3. Later, check for drift and visualize
./pinpoint drift 192.168.1.1
./pinpoint visualize drift 192.168.1.1
# β output/drift_timeline_192.168.1.1.html
# 4. Analyze specific targets
./pinpoint ljpw google.com --deep
./pinpoint ljpw github.com --deep
# 5. Generate comprehensive report
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24 --export-json network_report.jsonQuick Analysis Commands:
# Single target analysis with all visualizations
./pinpoint ljpw api.example.com --deep --visualize
# Compare multiple targets
./pinpoint ljpw google.com github.com cloudflare.com
./pinpoint visualize dashboard
# Network health check
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24 --health-check
# Export everything
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24 --export-allFull visualization guide: VISUALIZATION_ENHANCEMENTS.md
# Semantic ping with analysis
./pinpoint ping 8.8.8.8
# Traceroute with semantic path analysis
./pinpoint traceroute google.com
# Port scan with service classification
./pinpoint scan 192.168.1.1 -p 22,80,443,3389
# Comprehensive semantic profiling
./pinpoint ljpw api.example.com --deep# Map entire subnet with semantic clustering
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24
# Export topology to JSON
./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24 --export-json network_map.json
# Analyze specific operation
./pinpoint analyze "configure firewall rules to block unauthorized access"# Measure intent-context-execution alignment
./pinpoint ice \
"establish secure database connection" \
"network has strict firewall with limited bandwidth" \
"open port 3306 and configure mysql over tcp"
# High harmony = well-aligned operations
# Low harmony = potential mismatches/issues# Establish baseline
./pinpoint baseline google.com
# Check drift over time
./pinpoint drift google.com
# Visualize drift timeline
./pinpoint visualize drift google.com$ ./pinpoint map 192.168.1.0/24
π Scanning network: 192.168.1.0/24
======================================================================
β
Scanned 254 hosts, 12 reachable
πΊοΈ TOPOLOGY CLUSTERS
π Connectivity Cluster (5 devices) - Cohesion: 87%
Communication-focused: Web servers, communication hubs
β’ 192.168.1.10 - Web Service | Ports: 3 | Latency: 2.1ms
π Security Cluster (3 devices) - Cohesion: 92%
Access control-focused: Firewalls, authentication
β’ 192.168.1.1 - Security Gateway | Ports: 2 | Latency: 0.9ms
β‘ Performance Cluster (2 devices) - Cohesion: 78%
Speed/capacity-focused: Application servers, databases
β’ 192.168.1.50 - Database Server | Ports: 1 | Latency: 1.5ms
π Visibility Cluster (2 devices) - Cohesion: 95%
Monitoring-focused: SNMP agents, log servers
β’ 192.168.1.100 - Monitoring System | Ports: 2 | Latency: 3.2ms
π¨ ISSUES DETECTED (3):
CRITICAL:
β’ Insecure Services: 192.168.1.50
Dangerous ports exposed: [23, 21]
β Use SSH/SFTP instead of Telnet/FTP
π‘ OPTIMIZATION OPPORTUNITIES:
1. 192.168.1.10 - Security Upgrade (70% improvement potential)
HTTP without HTTPS - Enable TLS encryption
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β Network-Pinpointer Stack β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
CLI / API / Web UI
β
βββββββββββββββββββββ
β Semantic Engine β 355+ keywords mapped
β LJPW Framework β 4D coordinate system
β ICE Analysis β Harmony measurement
ββββββββββ¬βββββββββββ
β
βββββββββββββββββββββ
β Diagnostics Layer β Ping, trace, scan
β Network Mapping β Topology discovery
β Packet Analysis β Deep inspection
ββββββββββ¬βββββββββββ
β
InfluxDB / PostgreSQL / Redis
Components:
semantic_engine.py- Core LJPW mapping (300+ network terms)diagnostics.py- Network tools with semantic layernetwork_mapper.py- Topology scanning and clusteringvisualization/- Interactive HTML visualizationsapi_server.py- FastAPI REST endpoints
Detailed architecture: ARCHITECTURE_DIAGRAMS.md
- USAGE_GUIDE.md - Complete usage guide with examples
- WINDOWS_INSTALLATION.md - Windows-specific setup
- VISUALIZATION_ENHANCEMENTS.md - Interactive visualization features
- PRODUCTION_DEPLOYMENT.md - Full production setup
- BACKUP_RESTORE.md - Backup & disaster recovery
- .env.example - Configuration template (250+ options)
- ARCHITECTURE_DIAGRAMS.md - System architecture & data flows
- LJPW-MATHEMATICAL-BASELINES.md - Mathematical foundations
- LJPW_SEMANTIC_PROBE.md - Semantic probe guide
- CHANGELOG.md - Version history
- SECURITY.md - Security policy
- ISSUES_REPORT.md - Repository analysis
- FIXES_APPLIED.md - Fix documentation
| Scenario | How Network-Pinpointer Helps |
|---|---|
| Troubleshooting | Identify semantic mismatches between intent and execution |
| Security Audits | Find insecure services and overly complex attack surfaces |
| Performance Analysis | Locate performance bottlenecks, optimize resource allocation |
| Documentation | Generate semantic topology maps, verify architecture matches docs |
| Network Design | Plan infrastructure using LJPW framework for coherent design |
| Compliance | Track configuration drift, ensure policy enforcement |
This is experimental research. Contributions welcome!
Areas of interest:
- Expanding network vocabulary (300+ terms currently)
- Empirical validation of semantic mappings
- Integration with existing tools (Wireshark, Nagios, etc.)
- Historical analysis and drift detection improvements
- Cross-network pattern recognition
Development:
# Run tests
python3 tests/test_semantic_engine.py
# Offline mode testing
OFFLINE_MODE=1 python3 tests/test_real_packet_analysis.pySee ARCHITECTURE_DIAGRAMS.md for system design.
The LJPW semantic framework is under active development. Mathematical foundations are sound, but practical applications are still being explored.
Status:
- β Core semantic engine operational
- β Network vocabulary (355+ terms mapped)
- β Interactive visualizations (5 types)
- β Topology mapping and clustering
- β ICE harmony analysis
- π§ Historical trend analysis (in progress)
- π§ Predictive harmony modeling (planned)
- π§ ML-based pattern recognition (planned)
See LICENSE file.
- Python-Code-Harmonizer - LJPW framework for code analysis
- DIVE-V2 Engine - Core semantic substrate engine
Network-Pinpointer: Semantic Network Diagnostic Tool
Using LJPW (Connectivity-Security-Performance-Visibility) Framework
2025
Built with the LJPW Semantic Framework Connectivity β’ Security β’ Performance β’ Visibility