Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
|
Examples: Most of them can be fixed automatically by ruff. |
0 replies
|
I will look at this config in detail and get back to you. I'm generally ok with more checking, and some of the changes it suggests are reasonable, however I don't like a lot of the "simplify" ones, in particular SIM108 which changes if ... else ... blocks into the ternary operator. |
0 replies
|
After a bit more reading I'm inclined to adopt most of these but I think it's probably better if I do the edits, because I can group them into commits and we won't have any back and forth with me quibbling about which things I like and which I don't. Thanks for sending in the improved linting config! (I'll convert this to an issue and assign to me) |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I tried running
ruffwith some options that has been quite useful in other projects:This results in some errors. Should I try to to fix them?
All reactions