Example (from Smart Escrow devnet): https://custom.xrpl.org/wasm.devnet.rippletest.net/transactions/9CAB5548491496D71540990EBBE9ED1E2EA3491E3599ACBC9EBDB3585B8E2FCE/detailed
Status
This transaction failed with a status code of tecINSUFFICIENT_RESERVE, and validated in ledger 1071112 on March 20, 2026 at 10:31:11 PM UTC
Description
The transaction's sequence number is 1071083
The escrow was created by [rGxSWjhUpMWu6HNAx5MYXJNhrtkX4Jtqkp](https://custom.xrpl.org/> wasm.devnet.rippletest.net/accounts/rGxSWjhUpMWu6HNAx5MYXJNhrtkX4Jtqkp) and the funds will be returned to the same account
It escrowed 0.10 XRP
It can be cancelled after March 20, 2026 at 11:04:22 PM UTC
The Description section should not say "was created", "it escrowed" , or "can be cancelled" [sic] for an EscrowCreate transaction that failed with a tec code. No escrow was created, no funds were escrowed, and it cannot be canceled.
Aside: "canceled" (one L) is the correct spelling in US English.
Example (from Smart Escrow devnet): https://custom.xrpl.org/wasm.devnet.rippletest.net/transactions/9CAB5548491496D71540990EBBE9ED1E2EA3491E3599ACBC9EBDB3585B8E2FCE/detailed
The Description section should not say "was created", "it escrowed" , or "can be cancelled" [sic] for an EscrowCreate transaction that failed with a
teccode. No escrow was created, no funds were escrowed, and it cannot be canceled.Aside: "canceled" (one L) is the correct spelling in US English.