Does this Git Archaeologist finding match your view of react-hook-form's src?

[SushantVerma7969]

built an open-source git-history analysis tool called Git Archaeologist and I'm trying to understand where its output matches or diverges from maintainers' experience.

On react-hook-form it attributes ~59% of src/ commit-touches to a single contributor across ~410 files, and ranks useForm.ts, createFormControl.ts, and useFieldArray.ts as the highest-churn files.

Does that match where the real concentration and churn sit, or is it off?

[yckonnnnn]

An independent check on current master (36e5329) confirms the concentration and hotspots. Counting each commit-to-file touch for paths still tracked under src/, bluebill1049@hotmail.com accounts for 3,606 of 5,049 touches (71.4%) across 231 of 261 current src/ files. That differs from an all-history path count, which includes removed or renamed files, so the 59% / ~410-file result may use a different window or file identity rule.

The top files by historical touch count match your list: src/useForm.ts (746), src/logic/createFormControl.ts (420), and src/useFieldArray.ts (301). The ranking looks directionally right. Commit-touch concentration measures edit frequency, though, not maintenance effort. Which time window and path/rename rule does Git Archaeologist use?