Repository navigation
[audit-workflows] Agentic Workflow Daily Audit — 2026-11-09 #76314
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Agentic Workflow Audit Agent. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #76616. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
The requested 24-hour and 30-day log windows could not be collected completely. The available sample covers 7 hours 27 minutes on Nov 9: 187 executions, 157 successes, and 30 failures (83.96% raw success rate). The main reliability issue is the Auditor evidence-collection step, which failed in all 7 observed Auditor runs.
Key metrics
summary.engine_counts: Copilot 103, pi 47, Codex 24, Claude 7, Aider 1. Another 21 records had no engine ID.intentional_failure, so the marker could not be verified directly.Findings
View full findings
Collect health failures, cached logs and bounded audits. This continues the prior Auditor failure hotspot.Process Safe Outputs; this signature also appears in recent audit history.Handle agent failure, repeating the earlier conclusion-aftermath cluster.Next actions
Process Safe OutputsandHandle agent failurefailures.Trends
The captured 7h27 contains 157 successful and 30 failed executions, for an 83.96% success rate. Only Nov 9 has data; blank dates are unavailable, not zero, so this is not a complete 30-day trend.
The captured slice contains 14,466,798 tokens, including four Daily Go Test Parallelizer runs near 0.89–1.05 million tokens. One observed date is insufficient for a 7-day moving average or a 30-day comparison.
The audit-history upsert was accepted, but persistence is unconfirmed because the configured safe-output interface does not expose
push_ledger_changes. The chart files were saved under/tmp/gh-aw/agentbecause/tmp/gh-aw/python/chartsis read-only.References: §42693198722 · §42637893126 · §42693186092
All reactions