|
## Licenses |
|
|
|
Our group uses the following licenses: |
|
|
|
- Code/software: [MIT](https://opensource.org/license/mit) or [GNU GPL](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html) |
|
|
|
- Data: [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/)[^getting-credit-1] |
|
|
|
- Websites/course materials/other writing: [CC-BY](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
There aren't any guidelines here about who should be listed as the copyright holder in the license. For R packages, it should be "package authors", but what about something like course materials? Should it be something like "CCT Data Science Team" or should it be the authors of that material?
group-procedures/getting-credit.qmd
Lines 43 to 51 in f6da603
There aren't any guidelines here about who should be listed as the copyright holder in the license. For R packages, it should be "package authors", but what about something like course materials? Should it be something like "CCT Data Science Team" or should it be the authors of that material?