Replies: 3 comments
|
also can proxqp deal with simple box bound efficiently if a problem only have box constraint |
0 replies
|
If H is dense, it is thus better to use the dense backend. The sparse backend is still under development.
We can handle bound constraints as generic inequality constraints. Shortly, we will add explicit support for bound constraints for efficiency reasons. |
0 replies
Answer selected by
jcarpent
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
If H is dense, it is thus better to use the dense backend. The sparse backend is still under development.
What is the size of your problems? Could you share an example?
We can handle bound constraints as generic inequality constraints. Shortly, we will add explicit support for bound constraints for efficiency reasons.